About Me

Name: Edwin Leap
Email: edwinleap@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Why does marriage matter?

The next four years will likely be a time of cultural battle over same-sex marriage.  Despite legislative victories like Proposition 8 in California,  it's likely that judicial fiat will overrule the desire of the people.  Worse, judicial rulings that overturn legislative bans on same-sex marriage summarily dismiss the ages old morality of West and East, as well as the learned morality and wisdom of the people.  The people, incidentally, who are considered unwashed, barbaric, judgmental masses when the vote the wrong way, but enlightened instruments of change when they vote correctly; in presidential elections, for instance.

But in contemplating all of this, I've realized something.  You see, there are often realities behind realities, and questions beyond questions.  And the question I have to ask is this:  if traditional morality is wrong, or oppressive, useless or outdated, then why the angst over same-sex marriage?  I mean this:  if homosexuals consider their activities to be morally reasonable because older forms of morality are outdated and pointless, then why does it matter if they are married or not?

Most persons, even most conservatives that I know, are willing to concede domestic partnership for the purposes of insurance, inheritance, next-of-kin, power of attorney and other such benefits and legalities.  Given that, why does it matter if a gay or lesbian couple is considered married?  Isn't marriage the domain of fundamentalists and right-wing conservative Christians?  And, even so, aren't we always reminded that even Christians suffer from divorces in their marriages?  Why does it matter at all?

I have a couple of ideas:

First, if national legislation deems same-sex couples married, then we all have to accept that legality.  If you can't win hearts and souls, you can always legislate acceptance, I suppose.

Second, if such occurs, and others speak against it, they will be deemed purveyors of hate speech.  So, tolerance of viewpoints and lifestyles will be ever-after a matter of fiat, not morality, not love, not true acceptance.

Third, and perhaps most controversial, everyone knows that old forms of morality aren't outdated and aren't worthless.  They are of inestimable value.  So, stricken with the internal dissonance that accompanies a lifestyle that is inherently in conflict with traditional morality and the traditional religions from which the morality springs, same-sex couples want to find a way to enjoy justification of their own lifestyles.  'Well look, I'm married, aren't I?  I'm moral, aren't I?  You can't judge me, can you?' 

Well, yes, we can.  We can love love them and must.  We can protect them from injustice and violence, for this is our duty for every citizen.  We can treat them as equal citizens, for they are and should always be.  But we can judge what we consider an immoral activity and we can refuse to approve of it by granting it legal acceptance.  This is not discrimination, but discretion.  And if it is discrimination, then we can no longer use infidelity as an argument in divorce proceedings, because all of the old moral orders that concern relationships and marriage will be apparently considered defunct.

So, the next time someone asks you about gay marriage, ask them this question:  'Why does it matter?'

I think it's a very relevant question.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sexual teens are merely sexual children; let's protect them!

Sitting before me in the ER, smiling, was a 14-year-old girl.  Her mother was sitting in the chair by the stretcher.  The girl had been nauseated.  The question was, ‘why is she nauseated, does she have a virus?’  The subtext was ‘is she pregnant?’

Ultimately, the answer was ‘no.’  I delivered the answer, cryptically to avoid privacy violations, to her mother, her friends and her great, hulking boyfriend who was with the family in the emergency department.  When the nurses discharged them, she was sitting on said boyfriend’s lap, with mother in the room.

I’ve had conversations about this before, with other mothers and fathers and teens.  I’ve talked to boys and girls.  It’s my ‘what are you thinking?’ talk.  I didn’t have time or energy to get into it this time.  I just walked away to the tickled smiles of friends and family, resting happily in the knowledge that their friend, daughter, girlfriend could continue her sexual adventures, unimpeded by the pesky biological reality of pregnancy, and obviously unconcerned with the high probability of sexually transmitted infection.

She was on oral contraceptives.  I wonder if the person who wrote them for her talked about disease, or pregnancy.  I wonder if they cautioned her, or just said, as always, ‘use a condom and your pills and you’ll be fine!’  (In stark contrast to reality).  I wonder if they saw what I saw:  a child having sex.

Sure, she’s fourteen.  She has reproductive capacity and all the right parts.  Of course, in ages past she would probably have been a wife with one child already.  But life expectancies were remarkably short in past times.  And often, developing a family (via a marriage) was not only the honorable path before God and man, but also a means to collective security and food production, and the way to propagate a family in which death would occur too early for many of the young.  Those times have passed.  Food and medicine are available. People live very long lives.  Education and prosperity await the young if they so desire.

More than wondering about the people who distributed her contraceptives, I wondered about her mother.  I see the resignation in parents so often.  They seem to say to themselves:  ‘Well, she’s a teenager.  What can you do?  They have sex!  It’s natural.’  They watch too much television, read too many ridiculous magazines, absorb too much pornography or gossip or bad advice online.  Our culture has decided that these boys and girls, these teenage boys and girls, are just adults with acne.  The truth is, their brains are not ready for what we allow them to do.  Their brains aren’t ready for what society is encouraging them to do.  The pressures of intimacy, the possibility of parenthood, the pain of disease, the enormous emotional and physical consequences of the tragic default escape button, abortion.  These are children who should not be exposed to such as that.  Those are children who we, as a culture, are failing rather than liberating.

 

Parents need to be encouraged to say no.  ‘No, you can’t stay out all night.’  ‘No, you can’t have your boyfriend over when I’m not home.’  ‘No, you can’t go to that party, leave town with his friends, hang out with that crowd.’  No, you can't kiss my daughter (or son) at that age; much less do what you really want to do!'  The list goes on.

Is it that single mothers are overwhelmed?  Possibly.  The threat of a protective father looms large in the mind of many a young man who dates a girl.  If no father is present, the threat is remarkably lower.  Is it that no one was taught anyone better, not even the parents?  Certainly, many of the parents I meet grew up with the same moral laissez-fair attitude I see now.  Maybe that’s it.  Or is it that many  parents are just too self-centered, too busy, too easily influenced by bad ideas to step in and make rules?  A moral structure shaped by Oprah, Dr. Phil, Cosmopolitan Magazine and the 'altruistic' Hollywood marketing industry is the fall-back position when parents sound the retreat; or when parents simply surrender.

I suspect there is truth in all of those.  And I suspect there are many reasons for the behavior of the young boys and girls we see in clinics and ER’s because of sexual activity: the decline of families; the decline of intact marriages; the lassitude and cowardice of the church in speaking moral, spiritual truth in love; the laziness and political correctness of physicians, nurses and teachers, the cultural suicide that judges and legislators have brought down upon us.  It’s all a toxic soup.

But floating in that soup, drowning, cooking, are legions of teenagers who are doing what they shouldn’t.  They are teens having sex.  Rather, they are children having sex.  And it’s time we rescued them.

So the next time you see it or hear of it, be a pesky moralist.  And actually show some concern.  In the process offer them a choice, an option, a sense that maybe abstinence might be a good idea for lots of reasons! 

Maybe they’re doing what they’re doing because, ultimately, no adult seems to care about them anyway.  I don 't want to answer for that one on Judgment day.

Edwin

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »